• jaxxed@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 month ago

    No serious politicans nor militarty officers in the EU, nor NATO are talking about invading Russia.

    Such threat is a part of Russian propaganda, and is against the principle purpose of NATO.

    • Aedis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yikes. Being called Russian propaganda for just speculating.

      Fwiw I agree with you, no serious politician or officer would. Things like this just start out as an idea, maybe not even a realistic one. I’m fairly certain that if there ever was a threat of taking land from Russia, then China would step in.

      • jaxxed@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        What makes you think that China would step in?

        China could join in and take South-Eastern parts of Russia, where the poulation are very asian, and were historically Chinese aligned.

        • Aedis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I think China has a interest in keeping Russia as a vassal state if Russia falls that far. They have a lot of useful resources and it’s easier to own them in that way while providing “protection” than to have to deal with annexing and everything that comes with that.

          South Eastern parts could be annexed fairly easily, true. But I don’t know if there are any interesting resources in the rest of Russia that China has interest in.

      • jaxxed@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 month ago

        I didn’t call you a propaga dist, I said that Russia uses that concept of an impending NATO invasion as propaganda.

        Incidentally, that propaganda is traditionally more internally focused, than external.