inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world to Games@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agoIt turns out Saudi Arabia will own 93.4 percent of EA if the buyout goes through, which is effectively all of itwww.pcgamer.comexternal-linkmessage-square92fedilinkarrow-up1485arrow-down13 cross-posted to: gaming@lemmy.zippcgaming@lemmy.cagaming@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1482arrow-down1external-linkIt turns out Saudi Arabia will own 93.4 percent of EA if the buyout goes through, which is effectively all of itwww.pcgamer.cominclementimmigrant@lemmy.world to Games@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square92fedilink cross-posted to: gaming@lemmy.zippcgaming@lemmy.cagaming@lemmy.ml
minus-squareforrgott@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down1·edit-21 month agoYou seem to be under some misconception regarding who actually writes our laws. Hint: they’re called lobbyists to get people to ignore the rampant bribery.
minus-squaretitanicx@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down4·1 month agoBribery? They are buying a company. That’s it. There isn’t anything special about it. It’s like any other company out there.
minus-squareforrgott@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down1·1 month agoAnd I was talking about the so-called legality of the situation. So, pretty clearly not referring to the headline…
minus-squaretitanicx@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down7·1 month agoAgain, no legal issues.
minus-squareforrgott@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down2·1 month ago How about if you can’t follow a conversation, maybe stay out of it? Like, for real, I didn’t know that else to tell you.
minus-squareCocodapuf@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-21 month agoIf you’re not talking about the headline, what “situation” are you talking about? Honestly, I’m not sure you’re talking about anything.
You seem to be under some misconception regarding who actually writes our laws. Hint: they’re called lobbyists to get people to ignore the rampant bribery.
Bribery? They are buying a company. That’s it. There isn’t anything special about it. It’s like any other company out there.
And I was talking about the so-called legality of the situation. So, pretty clearly not referring to the headline…
Again, no legal issues.
How about if you can’t follow a conversation, maybe stay out of it? Like, for real, I didn’t know that else to tell you.
If you’re not talking about the headline, what “situation” are you talking about?
Honestly, I’m not sure you’re talking about anything.