inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world to Games@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoIt turns out Saudi Arabia will own 93.4 percent of EA if the buyout goes through, which is effectively all of itwww.pcgamer.comexternal-linkmessage-square92fedilinkarrow-up1476arrow-down13 cross-posted to: pcgaming@lemmy.cagaming@lemmy.zipgaming@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1473arrow-down1external-linkIt turns out Saudi Arabia will own 93.4 percent of EA if the buyout goes through, which is effectively all of itwww.pcgamer.cominclementimmigrant@lemmy.world to Games@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square92fedilink cross-posted to: pcgaming@lemmy.cagaming@lemmy.zipgaming@lemmy.ml
minus-squareforrgott@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down1·edit-22 days agoYou seem to be under some misconception regarding who actually writes our laws. Hint: they’re called lobbyists to get people to ignore the rampant bribery.
minus-squaretitanicx@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down4·2 days agoBribery? They are buying a company. That’s it. There isn’t anything special about it. It’s like any other company out there.
minus-squareforrgott@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down1·2 days agoAnd I was talking about the so-called legality of the situation. So, pretty clearly not referring to the headline…
minus-squaretitanicx@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down7·2 days agoAgain, no legal issues.
minus-squareforrgott@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down2·2 days ago How about if you can’t follow a conversation, maybe stay out of it? Like, for real, I didn’t know that else to tell you.
minus-squareCocodapuf@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-21 day agoIf you’re not talking about the headline, what “situation” are you talking about? Honestly, I’m not sure you’re talking about anything.
You seem to be under some misconception regarding who actually writes our laws. Hint: they’re called lobbyists to get people to ignore the rampant bribery.
Bribery? They are buying a company. That’s it. There isn’t anything special about it. It’s like any other company out there.
And I was talking about the so-called legality of the situation. So, pretty clearly not referring to the headline…
Again, no legal issues.
How about if you can’t follow a conversation, maybe stay out of it? Like, for real, I didn’t know that else to tell you.
If you’re not talking about the headline, what “situation” are you talking about?
Honestly, I’m not sure you’re talking about anything.