It’s going to be such a hack job with this takeover.

    • imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      I know at the very least 1 person who plays FIFA. I wouldn’t say that I am friends with this person, quite the opposite. But he is a classmate of my friends so they are friends with him. Even they wonder why would he keep buying FIFA each year.

    • MotoAsh@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      They always butchered games. What you’re remembering are the games made by studios that EA purchased, made before they were gutted for IP.

      • orbitz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        I could have sworn this one early mech game was made by EA (early/ mid 90s) Ultrabots in NA. Nope they just published it. I had a ton of fun with it but guess they mostly produced even if they owned the studio. Unsure in that case but we know how EA works. So appreciate you making me check that cause in my head they made some grear games I played not just published them. I’m sure their earlier days they must have but didn’t look.

      • That Weird Vegan she/her@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        I’ll never forgive them for killing the Dungeon Keeper franchise when they bought Bullfrog. That was such a great game. Even today, I still play the original DK which came out in the 90s.

        • MotoAsh@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Yea. There have been a few spiritual successors that are pretty good, but none match the raw… villainy? No crazy, hyperstylized parody of itself, just pure calm confidence from the narrator while you play the bad guys in an otherwise normal fantasy setting? It’s always great when a game just goes for it, and DK nailed it.

    • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      I remember when Skate 3 came out and people actually had positive opinions of EA and were excited about the games they made.

      • djsaskdja@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Dead Space too. They had a solid run in the late 2000s/early 2010s before doubling down on shit.

      • imetators@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        early 2000s EA was also on the horse. It used to be that when you hear “EA Games, challenge everything” upon opening a game, you knew that you are up for a good time. By the end of 00s that would drastically change

  • MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    If it’s over 51% it’s all of it for all practical reasons.

  • Lemminary@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    I wonder what they’ll do with IPs like The Sims. I can’t imagine they’ll allow same-sex relationships, naturally, but I don’t think they’ll allow divorce, either. :S

    • Honytawk@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Doesn’t matter, other games will replace them. Like InZoi.

      Same happened with Rollercoaster Tycoon (Planet Coaster), SimCity (Cities Skylines)

      • Lemminary@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Yeah, I have those games, but I want to know what direction they’ll take. I want to know how bold they would be if they wanted to.

    • Pyr@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      They might just sell the IP. I imagine they are mostly interested in the sports franchises.

    • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Why? Literally why would they give a shit? This only makes sense if you assume that they spent billions of dollars to export religious conservativism outside of Saudi Arabia. I dunno if you’ve noticed, but Saudi Arabia has been spending trillions of dollars to present a totally different, modern image to the world. The people spending the money don’t actually give a shit about Allah. They only care what other people will submit to in Allah’s name, and they know that’s not going to fly outside their borders.

      • Lemminary@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        21 hours ago

        Saudi Arabia is a country with one of the strictest laws in the world. Why shouldn’t anyone be suspicious of what they say or do? Why can’t people have a healthy amount of distrust and skepticism of their actions if, as you said, they’re trying to portray a different image of themselves to the world? Who says the mask can’t come off under the right circumstances, like the shameless right-wing downturn of the US?

        The Sims IP has always been one of the most welcoming and famous platforms for non-traditional values that directly contradict their country’s principles. Because I don’t know if you know, but homosexuality in Saudi Arabia is currently punishable by death. It’s fair to imagine that some company-wide policy changes would take place when it’s acquired to align with its own views, which also align with the Trump administration’s crusade to eliminate liberal ideas. I mean, didn’t they recently bribe him with a luxury jet? Don’t you think they could have a broader joint interest at heart?

        If franchises like Call of Duty have been targets of military marketing, it doesn’t take much to imagine how a corporation from an authoritarian country like SA would at least attempt to rein in social values in The Sims if given the chance.

        • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          16 hours ago

          Okay, but why? The hypothesis that they bought an extremely successful business because they want to make money doesn’t need any further explanation. What is the motivation for them to try to export their strict laws to other countries? You act like it gives them so much personal joy at taking away our gay kissing, that’s reason enough.

          • Lemminary@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            12 hours ago

            try to export their strict laws

            No, not laws, but religious views and values. That’s what their laws reflect. Religious people are famous for trying to proselytize, convert, and meddle because they have a very fundamental belief that they’re dealing with larger forces of good and evil.

            gives them so much personal joy at taking away our gay kissing

            Again, please don’t reduce my argument to absurdity. That is not a productive or respectful way of making your point.

    • COASTER1921@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      I suspect that they’d be more hands off than you may expect (if they chose to keep that IP at all). The sovereign wealth fund is first and foremost interested in growing their investment value. And this has only been further cemented as MBS has continued to stripped wahabists of power to the point that they have almost no state involvement anymore.

  • Lazer365@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    20 hours ago

    I just figured out yesterday that you can ignore publishers on Steam, never again will I have to see an EA game in my recommendations.

  • RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Well, at least Mass Effect LE came out first, I guess. I wonder if playing a new one owned by the Saudis and Kushner would cause some kind of tear in reality.

  • TotallyHuman@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 day ago

    If EA, having been purchased, is milked for cash, strip-mined for IP, and then unceremoniously abandoned, it will be very funny.

  • Codilingus@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Crossing my fingers, my toes, and knocking on wood.

    If this buyout goes through, plz plz plz plz leave Battlefield 6 alone. Its been over 10 years since a BF felt this fun.

    • 50MYT@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Bahahahahahahahahahahahshshaha

      The golden goose they will stuff with micro transactions and glow in the dark neon bullshit faster than the sweaty chopper nerds can camp the enemy spawn.

      Enjoy the last BF title while you can.

      Pray for another battlebit to come out of it.

  • SirSamuel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Oh man, the horror. Whatever will we do? I can’t imagine there’s any way we could obtain these games without contributing to the existence of this company. There’s nothing to be done. If only there was some, you know, exercise focused young woman that enjoyed traveling all of the time. So much so that her friends would pick on her. “That fit girl,” they’d say, “she just packs and repacks.” If only we could find this fit girl. I’m sure she could help us find a solution to this quandary

    -Norm MacDonald, probably

  • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    SA has a soon to be deady economy, because OIL doesnt last forever so they buy into whatever to keep thier country alive. SPORTSWASHIng , gamewashing.

    • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Just untrue. Saudi has massive deposits of rare earth metals, copper, gold. They’ll be fine.

      • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        24 hours ago

        if that were true, they wouldnt be desperately buying properities, and IP all over the world in the western world to stave off thier decline, clearly they dont see the NAT resources as enough, you should check your sources.

        • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          23 hours ago

          You are presuming they are doing that to stave off economic decline, which is incorrect. They’re doing it for global prestige.

      • MirthfulAlembic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        I don’t think anybody really knows. My understanding is the problem is KSA reports unaudited reserve numbers, so you have to take them at their word. There’s a lot of skepticism because they would report unchanged reserve numbers for years despite high exploitation. While they can certainly discover new reserves, it seems unlikely it would consistently be about equal to what they pumped out. I’ve read some analysts think they have less than half of what they report.

  • SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Man, I’m going to buy their games even less from now on. I have no clue when I bought the last electronic arts game, but it has to be at least a decade.