I do not really have a body for this. I was not aware that this is a thing and still feel like this is bs, but maybe there is an actual explanation for HDMI Forum’s decision that I am missing.
I do not really have a body for this. I was not aware that this is a thing and still feel like this is bs, but maybe there is an actual explanation for HDMI Forum’s decision that I am missing.
Well if you want anything over 35 inches a TV is your only option. They don’t really make monitors bigger than that.
Because we don’t all live in dorm rooms sitting at desks watching TV. Some of us need something besides a 32-in.
I have enough back problems to remember a time when a 32 inch television WAS a big-screen. My family had a 35 inch Sony Trinitron that weighted as much as a motorcycle. You do not NEED a 50+ inch screen.
I’m 43. I remember those days as well. It was shit.
I’m 38, and I remember the last gasps of CRTs in the early 2000s more fondly than the colicky 10-year toddlerhood of digital flat panels that followed.
I’m 40 and my only TV is a 13" CRT that I’m rocking for movies and games
I mean, you also had pretty low quality TV and home media, anything beyond 32 inches wasn’t doing much good for you.
Projectors have improved dramatically over the years. Any white wall can easily become a 100+inch display that’s good enough for movies.
well its not the only option, its the only consumer ended option.
the corporate option is large format display/digital signage screens
My experience is that digital signage displays are still HDMI-only.
many are hdmi only, but there are several that have display port as well. I see a lot since I work in lease return/e-waste recycling.