cm0002@suppo.fi to Comics@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 4 天前Out of the frying pan and into the firesuppo.fiimagemessage-square21fedilinkarrow-up1188arrow-down151
arrow-up1137arrow-down1imageOut of the frying pan and into the firesuppo.ficm0002@suppo.fi to Comics@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 4 天前message-square21fedilink
minus-squareparaphrand@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·4 天前I wonder if the pixelization filter is intended to try to make it appear less like AI output.
minus-squareAuster@thebrainbin.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up5·4 天前Dunno if it indeed is AI, though it does look a bit uncanny. But if it is, the filter sounds possible, as then it looks like some DOS-era digital drawing.
minus-squareparaphrand@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·4 天前Yeah, and I’m not aware of an ai that gets pixel art pixel perfect. I don’t see any distorted pixels
minus-squareLeonixster@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up16·4 天前Frog on the left cauldron has 2 fingers, frog in the air right in the middle has 4, the rest seem to have 3 fingers per hand and foot. That’s not conclusive evidence, but I think it’s worth mentioning
minus-squaredependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up7·4 天前Also frog I. The air on the right seems to have none on left leg.
minus-squarestray@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up6·edit-24 天前ChatGPT/Dall-E is fully capable of having generated this. e: I became curious whether it would recognize its own output. From looking at it, this looks like a stylized illustration or meme-style cartoon, not a natural photograph. Illuminating. It did direct me to a site called imgdetector.ai though, which found 99% probability of AI generation on both this and my test image.
minus-squarethe_mighty_kracken@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·4 天前Thanks for the website link. I got the same 99% probability rating on this image, and a 1% on four unrelated, human made images that I checked.
I wonder if the pixelization filter is intended to try to make it appear less like AI output.
Dunno if it indeed is AI, though it does look a bit uncanny.
But if it is, the filter sounds possible, as then it looks like some DOS-era digital drawing.
The text is the give away.
Yeah, and I’m not aware of an ai that gets pixel art pixel perfect. I don’t see any distorted pixels
Frog on the left cauldron has 2 fingers, frog in the air right in the middle has 4, the rest seem to have 3 fingers per hand and foot.
That’s not conclusive evidence, but I think it’s worth mentioning
Also frog I. The air on the right seems to have none on left leg.
ChatGPT/Dall-E is fully capable of having generated this.
e: I became curious whether it would recognize its own output.
Illuminating.
It did direct me to a site called imgdetector.ai though, which found 99% probability of AI generation on both this and my test image.
Thanks for the website link. I got the same 99% probability rating on this image, and a 1% on four unrelated, human made images that I checked.