• Auster@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 天前

      Dunno if it indeed is AI, though it does look a bit uncanny.

      But if it is, the filter sounds possible, as then it looks like some DOS-era digital drawing.

      • paraphrand@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 天前

        Yeah, and I’m not aware of an ai that gets pixel art pixel perfect. I don’t see any distorted pixels

        • Leonixster@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          4 天前

          Frog on the left cauldron has 2 fingers, frog in the air right in the middle has 4, the rest seem to have 3 fingers per hand and foot.

          That’s not conclusive evidence, but I think it’s worth mentioning

        • stray@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          4 天前

          ChatGPT/Dall-E is fully capable of having generated this.

          e: I became curious whether it would recognize its own output.

          From looking at it, this looks like a stylized illustration or meme-style cartoon, not a natural photograph.

          Illuminating.

          It did direct me to a site called imgdetector.ai though, which found 99% probability of AI generation on both this and my test image.

          • the_mighty_kracken@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 天前

            Thanks for the website link. I got the same 99% probability rating on this image, and a 1% on four unrelated, human made images that I checked.