Agent_Karyo@piefed.worldM to Horror Games@piefed.worldEnglish · 8 days agoThere's more to Horses than the Steam ban: The controversial horror game is a great example of how games can effectively borrow from film, and how they can also stumblewww.pcgamer.comexternal-linkmessage-square29fedilinkarrow-up119arrow-down11
arrow-up118arrow-down1external-linkThere's more to Horses than the Steam ban: The controversial horror game is a great example of how games can effectively borrow from film, and how they can also stumblewww.pcgamer.comAgent_Karyo@piefed.worldM to Horror Games@piefed.worldEnglish · 8 days agomessage-square29fedilink
minus-squareplantfanatic@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·edit-28 days agoYes. They had to clarify that every character is “obviously” over the age of 20. That’s not a claim that gets made if there was no way to make the mistake. Are you just willingly ignoring all the facts and details right in front of you to spin this fantasy of yours? And you are only using the current build, your information isn’t even applicable to the topic. My copy doesn’t have naked kids, so it never did. That’s your defense, when the game was stated to have been banned for… you guessed it! But are going to ignore it. Do you just lack basic reading comprehension skills? Or do you not know how to critically think for yourself?
minus-squareFeyd@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-28 days agoYou’re actually just wrong. The naked person in that scene was the horse/human. Never the not being treated as a horse person.
minus-squareplantfanatic@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·edit-28 days agoAccording to the dev…? Did he provide proof? Nope. Just deflects blame to valve instead. What a dev…. You can’t say the boogeyman doesn’t exist, then use the same for your defence. There was material that broke rules. They changed it to be acceptable. Literally the one thing you can’t do is child sexual material. Read between the fucking lines lmfao.
minus-squareFeyd@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·8 days agoYeah took the wind out of your sails finding out your outrage was based on poor reading comprehension didn’t it. No apology for me?
minus-squareplantfanatic@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-28 days agoWhy would I apologize to a pedo defender who lacks basic reading comprehension skills lmfao. How deluded are you? Do you even know what the term means? I just blew your defense apart by using your own, and you say I deflated my sails? Fucking lmfao. If my defense fails, so does yours, because it’s the same as yours you mook.
Yes. They had to clarify that every character is “obviously” over the age of 20.
That’s not a claim that gets made if there was no way to make the mistake.
Are you just willingly ignoring all the facts and details right in front of you to spin this fantasy of yours?
And you are only using the current build, your information isn’t even applicable to the topic.
That’s your defense, when the game was stated to have been banned for… you guessed it! But are going to ignore it.
Do you just lack basic reading comprehension skills? Or do you not know how to critically think for yourself?
You’re actually just wrong. The naked person in that scene was the horse/human. Never the not being treated as a horse person.
According to the dev…? Did he provide proof? Nope. Just deflects blame to valve instead. What a dev….
You can’t say the boogeyman doesn’t exist, then use the same for your defence. There was material that broke rules. They changed it to be acceptable.
Literally the one thing you can’t do is child sexual material. Read between the fucking lines lmfao.
Yeah took the wind out of your sails finding out your outrage was based on poor reading comprehension didn’t it. No apology for me?
Why would I apologize to a pedo defender who lacks basic reading comprehension skills lmfao. How deluded are you?
Do you even know what the term means? I just blew your defense apart by using your own, and you say I deflated my sails? Fucking lmfao.
If my defense fails, so does yours, because it’s the same as yours you mook.