• moody@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 days ago

    I would argue that the surface area of paste is less than the surface area of minced.

    • fizzle@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 days ago

      Only if you think of the mound of paste as the thing you’re measuring. If you’re measuring pieces of garlic obviously it’s much higher.

      Alternatively, just spread the paste really thin.

    • pishadoot@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 days ago

      Ok, so you’d argue incorrectly?

      Using a garlic press or a mortar+pestle by FAR exposes more surface area and expresses more oil and aromatics.

      Not sure how you can think that flat, cut surfaces on the exterior of undisturbed interior areas can somehow have less surface area than an amorphous blob of crushed matter.

      How in the world is this upvoted