You’ve caught me. This shitpost is part of my veiled conspiracy to increase oat milk sales using a diegetically attractive Santa Claus. It’s part of my cults plan to ensure the growth of the Quaker Man, who we keep in an underground vat we will eventually use to achieve the apocalypse.
It’s not 90% and it’s higher than others because PETA takes in all animals, unconditionally.
If they acted the same as everyone else you would have more animals suffering. Euthanasia isn’t great, but it’s the better alternative to leaving a near death animal on the side of the road to bleed out because no shelter will take them on.
You’ve caught me. This shitpost is part of my veiled conspiracy to increase oat milk sales using a diegetically attractive Santa Claus. It’s part of my cults plan to ensure the growth of the Quaker Man, who we keep in an underground vat we will eventually use to achieve the apocalypse.
Removed by mod
True, they probably have some hideous ulterior motive like reducing animal cruelty. Fucking jerks, why can’t they just want money?
PETA might reduce animal cruelty, by killing more than 90% of the animals they can get their hands on every year.
It’s not 90% and it’s higher than others because PETA takes in all animals, unconditionally.
If they acted the same as everyone else you would have more animals suffering. Euthanasia isn’t great, but it’s the better alternative to leaving a near death animal on the side of the road to bleed out because no shelter will take them on.
Removed by mod
Can you please link to whatever study this has come from as all I can find on Google is 2 mentions from old forum posts from 2007.
Removed by mod
So link it - because it’s not coming up when I searched for it, as I have shown already.