PugJesus@piefed.socialM to InhabitedBeauty@piefed.socialEnglish · 5 days agoRiver travel in the Democratic Republic of the Congomedia.piefed.socialimagemessage-square6fedilinkarrow-up159arrow-down11
arrow-up158arrow-down1imageRiver travel in the Democratic Republic of the Congomedia.piefed.socialPugJesus@piefed.socialM to InhabitedBeauty@piefed.socialEnglish · 5 days agomessage-square6fedilink
minus-squaresomeguy3@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·5 days agoYeah I’m not gonna call that one beauty. That’s dangerous.
minus-squareSteve@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·edit-25 days agoBeautifully fuck I would say
minus-squarePugJesus@piefed.socialOPMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·5 days agoBeauty and danger go together … but yes, this is certainly less conventional inhabited beauty
minus-squareTikiporch@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·5 days agoI got a feeling those aren’t sustainability harvested new growth kind of trees.
minus-squareAkasazh@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·5 days agoAlso do the all live there? If now I’d say there’s little habitation going on here
minus-squarePugJesus@piefed.socialOPMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 days agoActively used counts for the purposes of this comm.
Yeah I’m not gonna call that one beauty. That’s dangerous.
Beautifully fuck I would say
Beauty and danger go together
… but yes, this is certainly less conventional inhabited beauty
I got a feeling those aren’t sustainability harvested new growth kind of trees.
Also do the all live there?
If now I’d say there’s little habitation going on here
Actively used counts for the purposes of this comm.