PugJesus@piefed.socialM to InhabitedBeauty@piefed.socialEnglish · 4 months agoRiver travel in the Democratic Republic of the Congomedia.piefed.socialimagemessage-square6fedilinkarrow-up160arrow-down11
arrow-up159arrow-down1imageRiver travel in the Democratic Republic of the Congomedia.piefed.socialPugJesus@piefed.socialM to InhabitedBeauty@piefed.socialEnglish · 4 months agomessage-square6fedilink
minus-squaresomeguy3@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·4 months agoYeah I’m not gonna call that one beauty. That’s dangerous.
minus-squareSteve@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·edit-24 months agoBeautifully fuck I would say
minus-squarePugJesus@piefed.socialOPMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·4 months agoBeauty and danger go together … but yes, this is certainly less conventional inhabited beauty
minus-squareTikiporch@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·4 months agoI got a feeling those aren’t sustainability harvested new growth kind of trees.
minus-squareAkasazh@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4 months agoAlso do the all live there? If now I’d say there’s little habitation going on here
minus-squarePugJesus@piefed.socialOPMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 months agoActively used counts for the purposes of this comm.
Yeah I’m not gonna call that one beauty. That’s dangerous.
Beautifully fuck I would say
Beauty and danger go together
… but yes, this is certainly less conventional inhabited beauty
I got a feeling those aren’t sustainability harvested new growth kind of trees.
Also do the all live there?
If now I’d say there’s little habitation going on here
Actively used counts for the purposes of this comm.