The Picard Maneuver@piefed.world to Political Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoWell, that seems badmedia.piefed.worldimagemessage-square75fedilinkarrow-up1573arrow-down16
arrow-up1567arrow-down1imageWell, that seems badmedia.piefed.worldThe Picard Maneuver@piefed.world to Political Memes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square75fedilink
minus-squareEcho Dot@feddit.uklinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down3·2 days agoFirstly it’s not going to happen this is just something someone’s claim to they can make a thread. Zero sources posted. Secondly I’d like to see you craft a law that allows corporate VPNs but not private VPNs and doesn’t have any loopholes in it.
minus-squarebtsax@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·22 hours agoLaws don’t need to be meticulously worded to be logically consistent. They just need to be selectively enforced, like most other laws, to have the desired effect.
minus-squareEcho Dot@feddit.uklinkfedilinkarrow-up1·17 hours agoExcept that’s not how the law works. If you want the law to work it has to be logically enforceable if it isn’t logically enforceable it will get challenged in court.
Firstly it’s not going to happen this is just something someone’s claim to they can make a thread. Zero sources posted.
Secondly I’d like to see you craft a law that allows corporate VPNs but not private VPNs and doesn’t have any loopholes in it.
Laws don’t need to be meticulously worded to be logically consistent. They just need to be selectively enforced, like most other laws, to have the desired effect.
Except that’s not how the law works.
If you want the law to work it has to be logically enforceable if it isn’t logically enforceable it will get challenged in court.