I think qualified leadership is extremely important, but the leaders should be from the ranks of the experienced employees. Id opt for a sorta royal triumvirate kind of setup over the CEO model though. A committe seems too slow to work.
And collectively, they should own the business and vote on big decisions.
I think qualified leadership is extremely important, but the leaders should be from the ranks of the experienced employees. Id opt for a sorta royal triumvirate kind of setup over the CEO model though. A committe seems too slow to work.
And collectively, they should own the business and vote on big decisions.
Not so hard. Generally speaking, the ESOP model.
Or you could just have a co-op.
People on the floor together are usually pretty quick to react. It’s waiting on a leader to show up or make a decision that slows things down.
We live on different planets.
On my planet, people can’t even decide on the date of the Christmas party, let alone important stuff like business direction or R&D priorities.
USA vs Italy
Have the people on the floor of your company ever actually been given the option to decide the business direction or R&D priorities?
Maybe it’s bike shedding
They have been given much more trivial tasks and it was a shitshow and some people still don’t talk to each other over it.