You claim to have understanding and reason, but you are both for AI (which is entirely about profiting off of other people’s hard work) yet don’t like systems that profit off of other people’s hard work.
Never talked to someone who’s never seen a mirror before, maybe you should try it sometime, get some self reflection.
Sorry, do you think people are making money on ai?
And you can understand that things aren’t either for or against right? Like, you’ve heard of nuance before?
I am ABSOLUTELY for using a model made of stolen copyrighted works to replace all the human actors in a movie with muppets. Absolutely. 100%.
I am NOT for profiting off that.
And beyond this in the bigger sense: do you think anyone other than nvidia and computer hardware makers are profiting from ai?
Who? Where? Because I haven’t heard of them.
This shit is an expensive boondoggle that is NOT driving roi. At least that’s what literally everything everywhere and my own experience indicates, but if that’s incorrect then by all means show me the money.
OH MY GOD I JUST LOOKED IN THE MIRROR. IT TURNS OUT IVE BEEN A HALF MAN HALF BAT CREATURE THIS ENTIRE TIME. I HAVE WINGS BRO. IM GONNA GO FLY AROUND A BIT AND EAT SOME FUCKING INSECTS.
Bruv I was talking about Nvidia and then making profits while other companies slash overhead by replacing workers. You found the thing I was talking about, good job you magnificent bat boy
So when I talk about using a Facebook model (which has already been trained) on my own pc (which I already own).
Where’s tha profit exactly?
If I’m confused about how egalitarian my hot take is - where is the money?
You’ve agreed that the only people making money in this tech are the hardware manufacturers . So - are you opposed to the creation of computer hardware? Or just tech that could be used in ai?
You said that you’re opposed to people profiting off the hard work of others - which I agree with. And would be commensurate with a stance opposing capitalism, and a stance against the creation of of hardware for profit. So am I understanding you correctly? Are you opposed to the production of computer hardware for profit?
If I’m not understanding this correctly then your opposition doesn’t make a lot of sense to me. You’re talking about the dangers of people being replaced by this tech while I’m discussing altering a movie that’s already been made, for free, with software that developers have been paid (in some cases) to create but original ip owners have not, that is distributed for free, to create something that would be distributed for free.
Who’s getting replaced here? Who’s making money off the backs of others except hardware manufacturers?
You claim to have understanding and reason, but you are both for AI (which is entirely about profiting off of other people’s hard work) yet don’t like systems that profit off of other people’s hard work.
Never talked to someone who’s never seen a mirror before, maybe you should try it sometime, get some self reflection.
Sorry, do you think people are making money on ai?
And you can understand that things aren’t either for or against right? Like, you’ve heard of nuance before?
I am ABSOLUTELY for using a model made of stolen copyrighted works to replace all the human actors in a movie with muppets. Absolutely. 100%.
I am NOT for profiting off that.
And beyond this in the bigger sense: do you think anyone other than nvidia and computer hardware makers are profiting from ai?
Who? Where? Because I haven’t heard of them.
This shit is an expensive boondoggle that is NOT driving roi. At least that’s what literally everything everywhere and my own experience indicates, but if that’s incorrect then by all means show me the money.
OH MY GOD I JUST LOOKED IN THE MIRROR. IT TURNS OUT IVE BEEN A HALF MAN HALF BAT CREATURE THIS ENTIRE TIME. I HAVE WINGS BRO. IM GONNA GO FLY AROUND A BIT AND EAT SOME FUCKING INSECTS.
Bruv I was talking about Nvidia and then making profits while other companies slash overhead by replacing workers. You found the thing I was talking about, good job you magnificent bat boy
Oh okay.
So when I talk about using a Facebook model (which has already been trained) on my own pc (which I already own).
Where’s tha profit exactly?
If I’m confused about how egalitarian my hot take is - where is the money?
You’ve agreed that the only people making money in this tech are the hardware manufacturers . So - are you opposed to the creation of computer hardware? Or just tech that could be used in ai?
You said that you’re opposed to people profiting off the hard work of others - which I agree with. And would be commensurate with a stance opposing capitalism, and a stance against the creation of of hardware for profit. So am I understanding you correctly? Are you opposed to the production of computer hardware for profit?
If I’m not understanding this correctly then your opposition doesn’t make a lot of sense to me. You’re talking about the dangers of people being replaced by this tech while I’m discussing altering a movie that’s already been made, for free, with software that developers have been paid (in some cases) to create but original ip owners have not, that is distributed for free, to create something that would be distributed for free.
Who’s getting replaced here? Who’s making money off the backs of others except hardware manufacturers?