cross-posted from: https://beehaw.org/post/17202407

Sen. Roger Marshall (R-KS) introduced a bill this week to legally erase transgender people, entitled the “Defining Male and Female Act of 2024.” He claimed that the bill will stop what he called the Biden administration’s attempt to “replace biological sex with dangerous radical gender ideology.”

The bill is a long list of terms and definitions, where words like “father” and “girl” are defined with the words “male” and “female.” Those two words are then defined as “an individual who naturally has, had, will have, or would have, but for a congenital anomaly or intentional or unintentional disruption, the reproductive system that at some point produces, transports and utilizes [sperm or eggs for male or female, respectively] for fertilization.”

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Someone should establish a Department of Senate Efficiency to look into whether that is an efficient use of the senates time.

  • RandomVideos@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Not the dangerous radical gender ideology of trying to be happy

    Is there any argument for trans people getting their rights removed?

            • SulaymanF@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              8 hours ago

              If that were a valid explanation then why is the bill banning any adult recognition of trans adults?

              There’s a different conversation on whether to allow gender affirming therapy for minors.

              • Aermis@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                6 hours ago

                Sure. Different conversation I agree. I wasn’t commenting to the original post. Just that the idea that transgenderism and the issues surrounding it arent hard discussions with people outside of the community here is irrational.

            • trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              9 hours ago

              Ah yes not bigotry just made up bs points that are meant to do nothing but stop trans people from being accepted.

              A lot of these points had analogues in the past with other minority rights movements, but why look to the past and see how those points were non-issues when we can instead get mad about the transgenders CoNfUsInG OuR ChIlDrEn.

              And

              Suicide causes for transgender teens is often reported as bullying or bigotry, but not often reported on the lack of support for dysphoria and other mental health conditions.

              This just means we need to let kids be who they are and support them in their transition, that is the only logical conclusion of that issue.

              People matter.

              Unless they’re t****n freaks, then they can get outed to their abusive parents and sent to conversion camps for all I care :^)

              • Aermis@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 hours ago

                Are you referring to yourself? No one who loves their children wants to send them to conversion camp. There are definitely discussions to have regarding the proper medical treatments and psychological care and how the involvement of the state and legislature hurts more than helps. But I don’t want the state being involved in how we raise our children. I don’t want to change children or parents sending their kids to camp. But you can’t pretend that parents and our communities aren’t involved in the way a child is raised, how they grow mentally and encouraging strengths, and guiding them in a healthy way. Let kids be who they are and make sure they get the support they need.

            • webadict@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              ·
              11 hours ago

              Making everything sexual for children while not even acknowledging the sickness of it.

              Same shit said about gay people.

              Being gay isn’t sexual. Being straight isn’t sexual. Being trans isn’t sexual. Someone saying they are a girl is not sexual. Someone saying they are a boy is not sexual.

              You see how none of this relates to sex?

              The real answer is that a lot of people don’t really understand being trans. A lot of people used to the same way about gay and lesbian people. Conservatives tried to rally hard against gay and lesbian people, but that proved unpopular. Trans people don’t have that same protection. So, they’ll go after it until people finally get it.

              Conservatives only have identity politics.

              • Aermis@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                10
                ·
                10 hours ago

                I’m referring to nudity and expressing sexuality in front of children. Drag and children. Parades of expression with children involved. Seeing essentially naked men and women and children being encouraged to interact in it.

                • Todd Bonzalez@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  5 hours ago

                  Good lord, nudity isn’t even a real issue. I regularly swim laps at my local public pool, and the changing room and showers regularly see a mix of children and adults. I don’t see any kids getting their innocence destroyed in the locker room or showers, and we’re all naked in there.

                  People only care when it’s trans people wearing clothes. They don’t really care about nudity, they’re trying to create a moral panic about queer people by suggesting that they are a threat to children.

                • webadict@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  ·
                  9 hours ago

                  Nudity is also not inherently sexual. You can be naked for reasons outside of having sex, such as cleaning yourself, using the bathroom, changing outfits, sunbathing, relaxing, etc. None of those are inherently sexual.

                  Wearing drag is not sexual either. It’s been a thing for centuries, and that’s just the easily identifiable stuff.

                  Wearing kink gear is not inherently sexual, though I can understand that you don’t recognize that because it has connotations. But you can wear it without it being a sexual act.

                  “Expressing” sexuality is purposefully vague. Is kissing expressing sexuality? Is holding hands? Children do those. That would be an expression of your sexual orientation. You aren’t really making any sense.

              • Thisiswritteningerman@midwest.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                10 hours ago

                I’ll agree someone saying they are are a girl/boy or trans isn’t sexual. Gender isn’t inherently sexual. Someone being gay/straight feels like it’s absolutely sexual. Implied with the"sexual" in homo or heterosexual. You could have nonsexual gay/straight thoughts/feelings I guess, but those are just feelings. Like, ANYONE is allowed to have them regardless of orientation, and honestly sounds like it’s bordering on asexual. Do you have a learning example for that line of thought? Before any angry blowback: I’m not trying to be a dick about this. As far as my understanding of this goes, I don’t follow that comment.

          • RandomVideos@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            15 hours ago

            That was what i was asking

            One argument i have seen against acknowledging the existence of trans people is that people will be tricked into changing their gender

            Its not a good argument, but it exists.

  • stembolts@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    1 day ago

    Setting aside the mind, it is a biological fact that approximately 1 in 1700 people are born with both sexual organs.

    They’re supposed to just, die?

    • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Because irony has been bludgeoned to death by these bigots, I’d like to point out they’ve already been performing sex-reassignment surgery on intersex infants to make them conform to a binary sex, without the knowledge or consent of the baby and sometimes the parents. That’s been happening for ages in some places.

      So all their tantrums over kids getting sex surgeries are technically true, except they have it completely backwards. It’s done to newborns to force traditional conformity, and they’re the ones doing it.

  • kescusay@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    102
    ·
    2 days ago

    Might as well define the Earth as flat and the Moon as green cheese while he’s at it.

    Do these fuckers have literally nothing else to do than wage wars against reality?

  • TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him)@badatbeing.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 day ago

    We need media stepping up the messaging that the Right is infatuated with the genitals of people, especially children. Outside of maybe your Dr. (and/or partner), nobody should be talking about, or caring about your genitals to the degree the Right is in this pervy/pedo crusade of late.

  • fedupwithbureaucracy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    2 days ago

    We really need to start saying that these people want their own family members killed. It seems to be the only thing that can get some people to listen

    • floofloof@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      1 day ago

      Aren’t doctors supposed to take an oath to do no harm? This will cause so much harm.

    • tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Dr Oz is a real doctor as well. Unfortunately medical school doesn’t prevent people from being delusional. Or giant assholes for that matter

  • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 day ago

    Man, I hope all the trans who said they wouldn’t vote for Harris because she didn’t talk about them are feeling great about the new government that will be in control during the next few years!

  • RubberElectrons@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    of course I hate the active reduction of freedom. But may I ask, how important is this? Will trans people be able to continue to survive? Existing and being who you believe you are seems to be the important detail which pisses then off. They can’t do anything but be explicitly rude.

    Should someone decide to fight you for being trans, I will fight for + with you.

    Writing this comment mildly drunk, I’m sure there’s problems with it, but what if it’s like rain off a window, you look at it and ignore it?

    • hovercat@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Getting rid of Title IX protections is going to make surviving pretty fucking hard if you wind up with a bigoted manager who decides to fire you… Or just companies decide they don’t want to hire trans people at all.

      • RubberElectrons@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        😮‍💨 it kinda seems like these companies already disengage once they meet via video or in person. Generic reasons are presented, “poor for for the team” etc.

        If an HR person is dumb, you’ve possibly got em dead to rights with IX and some kind of evidence. I just think it’s so crazy to disregard someone’s potential just because they want to exist as their internal self.

        Over time, that particular org won’t be as successful as the one hiring candidates for effectiveness over appearance, but damn does it suck for the individual bring denied at that time.

    • Tiefling IRL@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      This is a precursor to them trying to sue trans people for “fraud” by having documents with the correct gender marker. Also, the cruelty is the point, and this is in itself cruel.

      • RubberElectrons@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        Cripes. The fuckin struggle just to survive never ends. I don’t get what people’s problem is, and at this point an convinced I never will. Fuck em.

    • grysbok@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 day ago

      They can also force transgender people in institutional settings (prison, college, military, etc) to be housed with the wrong gender. That can be dangerous.