Silliari@quokk.au to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 19 days agoi don't physically own it, i have a piece of paper in the town hall saying i doquokk.auimagemessage-square41fedilinkarrow-up1597arrow-down118 cross-posted to: mop@quokk.au
arrow-up1579arrow-down1imagei don't physically own it, i have a piece of paper in the town hall saying i doquokk.auSilliari@quokk.au to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 19 days agomessage-square41fedilink cross-posted to: mop@quokk.au
minus-squareLushed_Lungfish@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·19 days agoNot quite. I believe the historical consensus is that if you can defend it, you own it.
minus-squareazolus@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·18 days agoLast time I checked the historical consensus was “they need the state to enforce property rights bc having their own militias to defend their property isn’t feasible”
Not quite. I believe the historical consensus is that if you can defend it, you own it.
Last time I checked the historical consensus was “they need the state to enforce property rights bc having their own militias to defend their property isn’t feasible”