• Rose@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    The US support has always been viewed as crucial, which is probably why Zelensky was so eager to please Trump by being among the first to congratulate him. If you were to ask me, I’d say Europe is strong enough to help Ukraine win, but one could argue that the will would wane if America pulls out. Moreover, there are reports that suggest the Ukrainian decision-makers are prepared for territorial concessions.

    • Buffalox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      From your link:

      Ukraine is being told it will have to make serious territorial concessions

      That’s not agreeing to make concessions. And a piece built on MAGA claims is not really an interesting read IMO.
      If you want to make a point based on an article, quote the part you think support it.

      if America pulls out.

      America is in no way in Ukraine, so they can’t “pull out”.

      • Rose@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        From my link:

        Of course, this means Russian President Vladimir Putin’s thuggishness will be rewarded, that there will be no accountability for the bestial nature of his army’s atrocious behavior or the unlawful, detestable deportations from occupied parts of Ukraine to Russia. The axis of autocrats will be emboldened in their determination to smash the old global order.

        But there’s no other alternative. Short of a “forever war” or Western powers becoming combatants themselves — or at least putting their economies on a war footing to supply Ukraine with much more than they currently are — that’s the cold hard reality.

        And according to a Republican foreign policy expert familiar with Zelenskyy and his circle, Kyiv understands this. Asking to remain anonymous in order to speak candidly, Kyiv now reckons Trump may well turn out to be a better option than Harris, he said.

        Also:

        After Trump’s win, Florida Senator Marco Rubio, who’s being tipped as the new secretary of State, said that Russia’s war against Ukraine had reached a “stalemate” that’s costing lives and “needs to be brought to a conclusion.” He described Ukrainians as “incredibly brave and strong,” but also noted “the reality of the war.”

        Zelenskyy understands that too — not that he’s going to shout it from the rooftops. As war-weariness mounts, public opinion in Ukraine has been changing, especially among the young, who are the most willing to accept limited outcomes. According to a poll conducted this summer, only 40 percent of those aged 18 to 25 think Ukraine should fight until it liberates all its territory.

        • Buffalox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          That’s just hearsay, but even if true, it doesn’t support your claim. “understanding” almost surely doesn’t mean what you seem to think it means. And the part about 18-25 year olds are not “Ukrainian decision-makers”.

          Ukraine officials have been VERY clear, there can be no peace with concessions to Russia, because that will almost surely mean Russia will invade again, when they have gathered strength.

          If Ukraine were to surrender territory, they would have to be allowed into NATO, to be secured from repeat attack from Russia. Otherwise Russia will just think they can take some piece of Ukraine now, and the rest later.

          • Rose@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 month ago

            If Ukraine were to surrender territory, they would have to be allowed into NATO, to be secured from repeat attack from Russia.

            I do think that’s one of the more realistic scenarios expected under Trump, though I’m not sure about it having to rest specifically on NATO and not some other written security guarantees. However, in that scenario, Russia gets to keep its gains and the world returns to business as usual, as we saw after Russia’s actions in Moldova, Georgia, Syria, Ukraine in 2014, etc (and that’s just the military involvement, not to mention the countless influence and infiltration campaigns, isolated sabotage and killings in Europe, among other things). It could stop Russia from moving forward in Ukraine, but it wouldn’t stop Russia from choosing another target as it always has.

            • Buffalox@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              30 days ago

              and not some other written security guarantees.

              Ukraine was already guaranteed that Russia wouldn’t attack them, when they gave up their nuclear weapons to Russia in the 90’s. Something similar will not fly again.

              • Rose@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                30 days ago

                I agree, but the part about not caring if it’s NATO is something Zelensky said himself.