• tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Fuck no. I don’t want to go back to downtown DC and its maps that were smaller than fucking 1v1 quake area maps.

    I mean, some of that is also the time. Fallout 3 was done in 2008. That’s almost twenty years back. Say a typical computer that it might be played on then was maybe three years old? You can only fit so much in both VRAM and main memory on a computer from 21 years back.

    Like, one popular mod for Skyrim I recall merged city areas with the outside, surrounding areas. Bethesda split them up back in the day to keep resource requirements down, but today, that’s an optimization that you don’t really need. You can just throw hardware at the problem.

    • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      I mean, some of that is also the time. Fallout 3 was done in 2008. That’s almost twenty years back. Say a typical computer that it might be played on then was maybe three years old? You can only fit so much in both VRAM and main memory on a computer from 21 years back.

      fair point

    • Flamekebab@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      You’re making me feel so old with regards to how you’re downplaying computing capabilities back then.

      Fallout 3 was not a graphically impressive game when it was new. Compared to games several years old its maps were small and pokey.

      The limiting factor was only hardware in as much as their tech was and still is horrendously inefficient.