Looks like the Ghostrunner developers also have an issue with paid mods running off their IP.

  • nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    2 months ago

    I don’t understand this at all.

    rockstar did the same thing to the VR mods that were made for GTA games.

    the guys are developing mods that are going to make me want to purchase and play the game. why is that a problem?

    I don’t understand intellectual property

    • God's hairiest twink@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      90
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      In this case it’s cause the modder is charging money for the mod, I think CD Project Red even offered to allow it to exist if he stopped charging before this, so I would argue this is on the modder

      • nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        54
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I don’t understand what difference it makes to CDPR. if the guy makes a few bucks developing mods for the game, then he can spend more of his time developing the mod, and making mods for other games. right? in what way is it harming CDPR

        • kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          40
          ·
          2 months ago

          He always had the option of using a donate option instead of locking it behind a paywall. CDPR tried getting him to go that route and he basically told them to pound sand so here we are.

        • Stern@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          26
          ·
          2 months ago

          Property rights get all sorts of goofy when money is involved. If homey had released the mod for free and just had a patreon or whatev on the side, no one would care, but because he was charging for it, CDPR is obigated to vigorously defend their copyright.

    • iamthetot@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      I don’t understand intellectual property

      I’m asking from a place of curiosity, not a place of judgement. Have you ever created anything? A piece of art, poem or prose, a film, a program, etc?

      • verdi@tarte.nuage-libre.fr
        link
        fedilink
        Français
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Copyright makes no sense. As long as there is a correct citation, it’s kosher as far as I’m concerned.

        “This song was originally created by @turdnugget” should be the point of copyright and not the current rent seeking behaviour of the ruling class.

          • verdi@tarte.nuage-libre.fr
            link
            fedilink
            Français
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Plenty of music, still think copyright is stupid.

            Attribution, 100%, copyright itself is stupid.

            Now I extend the same question to you.

                • iamthetot@piefed.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  No, I’d like to do that myself. Mostly need the time and sufficient motivation. Most of my time is eaten up GMing multiple ttrpgs a week right now.

                • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  I think that’s the easy bit. For me at least.

                  Any sort of artwork is expensive to commission though. And if you’re born without a shred of artistic talent in your entire being, you ain’t doing it yourself.

                  So I’ve got some very broad strokes vision of a game I want to build and I haven’t expanded on it further because I know I can’t afford to make it.

                  If I do decide to make it, I’d have to hire someone to do 3D modelling* at the very least. I don’t see a world where that’s feasible without copyright, because then I’d just be paying someone’s salary (or commissions) and be out of pocket for it.

                  * No, don’t worry, I’m not thinking of yet another photorealistic-ish looking 3D game. More like something in the style of the 3D Zelda games or like some of the (MMO)RPGs of the 00s.

        • Thymos@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          So, what if I wrote a book and got it published, but it didn’t sell well. Some big company copies it, puts a lot of effort in promoting it and it becomes a bestseller. I don’t get any of the money for it, but they cite me as the original author. How is that fair?

              • verdi@tarte.nuage-libre.fr
                link
                fedilink
                Français
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                You did not describe a copyrightless world, you described academic publishing. On that note, fortunately open access allows the have nots to acquire the same knowledge of the haves. Elabakyan showed how good it could be but the copyright barons had to ruin it for everybody. Furthermore, removal of copyright would curtail the elite’s ability to impose a message on the proletariat.

      • [object Object]@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        In sim racing, Assetto Corsa has tons of paid mods, and simultaneously its developer is one of very few profitable companies. How come Kunos aren’t bankrupt from paid mods existing?

      • erin@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        I am an artist who is VERY anti-IP law. The system as it exists is evil and does far more harm than good. IP is not some holy grail that deserves protection when it can be so easily abused. I would rather have no IP law than the current system, but I’ll settle for reforms.

        • iamthetot@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          2 months ago

          Evil is a really strong word that I’m not sure I can get behind here.

          • erin@piefed.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            It’s part of an overall system that protects the Haves from the Have-Nots. I consider it evil.

        • Vespair@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          I agree with this.

          That said, the prohibition of paid mods should be a cultural matter, not a legal one. It shouldn’t be illegal, but we as a gaming community should refuse to engage with them as poor practice

          • nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            I have no idea what your question is getting at. I am a published artist but I pay my bills with unrelated W-2 work

            • iamthetot@piefed.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              I said from the get go that I was asking from a place of curiosity not judgement. I wasn’t “getting at” anything. It interests me to know what your stance is and how it might be informed. Congrats on being published, that’s pretty cool.

    • darkkite@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Not exactly, they made him remove the RDR 2 vr mod. the GTA is still up on github.

      this is a terms of service issue, but they’re using dmca (copyright) to enforce.

      he technically has a case for selling, but defending it would be too expensive. LR also isn’t socially adept so he’s self-sabatoged himself too.