• usernamefactory@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    12 hours ago

    How’s that? If 10 of your coworkers rated your job performance as 5/10; would you think that’s not a critical indicator of a failing performance?

    No. I’ve never been evaluated in such a fashion, and I’d resent it if I were. I think my boss should have the competence to judge my work on its own merits. I judge the shows I watch the same way.

    I’m confused as to your purpose here. You seem to be arguing that the show is bad because it’s unpopular. Is that how you form all your opinions? Popular vote, no need to think for yourself?

    • Abundance114@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      You seem to be arguing that the show is bad because it’s unpopular.

      The premis of the thread seems to be that the show is getting review bombed because of MAGA. I pointed out that filtering out the United States still gives abysmally low scores.

      If you look at viewer count (low) and review bombs (high), it seems to indicate that the producers are wildly out of touch with what the majority of the Star Trek audience is about.

      • usernamefactory@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        The premis of the thread seems to be that the show is getting review bombed because of MAGA.

        What? No. The video OP posted was talking about specific nonsense positions put forward by specific nonsense people. I don’t believe it mentioned view counts or review aggregators. You’re the one who brought those up.

        You seem very concerned with how popular this show is. To the point where, when I asked you if popularity is all you base your opinions on, all you could do is loop around to trying to convince me that that this show is unpopular. I guess that’s my answer.

        • Abundance114@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          The video OP posted was talking about specific nonsense positions put forward by specific nonsense people.

          Which might not be stated but I feel is a defensive response to the negative reviews.

          Is this video about MAGA response?

          Are the negative reviews most likely from MAGA style viewers?

          Yes? Then the two are absolutely connected.

          You seem very concerned with how popular this show is.

          I’ve answered this multiple times. Low viewship and high review bombs clearly indicate a disconnect between production and what’s expected by the audience. Sure they can produce whatever they want, but if Ford Motors starts producing coffee, then don’t be surprised when their customer base says “WTF, we don’t want this, we never asked for this”.

          • usernamefactory@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            You’re saying that any rejoinder offered to any criticism that might have been levied to by a right winger is de facto an accusation of review bombing and an assertion of the show’s popularity in spite of such?

            Stretch Armstrong could not stretch this far. Michael Jordan at the end of Space Jam has nothing on you. You are one stretchy, stretchy individual.

            And you’re still trying to argue with me about how popular the show is! Amazing.

            • Abundance114@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              You’re saying that any rejoinder offered to any criticism that might have been levied to by a right winger is de facto an accusation of review bombing and an assertion of the show’s popularity in spite of such?

              No. I’m not saying that.