And yet, this page exists: https://legalclarity.org/when-is-feeding-the-homeless-considered-illegal/
Trillions in taxes collected and we can’t afford to feed kids at school. War machine go brrrrrrr tho!!
More like trillions in debt acquired. Taxing is socialism.
First reaction that the kid is dealing drugs and needs to be investigated is pretty on brand for schools.
And with Nutella, treating his peers well!
Palm oil and sugar. The breakfast of champions
Why vis lunch so contentious in the US? Why do people have lunch debt?
We have poor people in other countries too. They don’t get free lunches, but it doesn’t seem to be such a contentious issue.
So was he expelled?
Nutella? Nestle? On the gallows that piece of shit: it would be better if he distributed cocaine.
I can’t imagine this is not sarcasm.
To say buying nestle, even tho Nutella is not owned by nestle, is worse than leaving children to stay hungry is just…
Isn’t cocaine dumbs feeling of hunger?
Dude can feed their hungry friend whatever brand they wanted, virtue signalling feed no one.
Cocaine dealers in my area are usually not accused of virtue signalling.
Nutella is owned by Ferrero, not Nestlé. Still an environmental catastrophe but somewhat morally less bankrupt.
Some will consider that an even more serious offense.
