We all know what AI is doing to the workforce but that’s no mystery. Has AI actually served you well, or is it all overhyped slop?

  • HrabiaVulpes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    I use it daily as a glorified search engine. Ever since Google decided that showing ads is more important than showing search results ChatGPT is much better.

  • HubertManne@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    It will continue to improve function wise. Its innevitable. Its cannot currently and may never be able to replace humans but can act as one heck of an assitant. Its scary as heck as already the training is not being done in an optimized, deliberate way that makes it as high quality as possible and those who control it when doing deliberate things are likely to do it in a way that is good for them but not for all. Im worried we won’t get the very good training in the same way software is often done badly because once it can do good enough, even inefficiently, then it will ship. Our best options will be free/libre.

  • zensanto@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    It’s invaluable.

    It has already saved me so much time and allowed me to do things I wouldn’t have been able to do otherwise.

    I’m sold on it.

  • greenbit@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    It’s what they’ll use to decrease the population when workers aren’t needed anymore

  • quediuspayu@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Potentially useful for lots of thing, unfortunately, everyone seems fixated on stuff that is not ready for and probably wont be, or on hating everything involved.

    Me? Mostly on the fence, hating most of what I see and hopeful for those useful applications.

  • WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    It broke me out of a broken mindset at least, since no human would actually talk to me in a wise way, this therapy-pilled bot did that job instead.

    It really is a good search engine, provided you check sources. It’s a good way to get around the enshitified google searches.

    Good for bouncing ideas off, and low-effort stories where you play whatever role your friends would not put up with. In other words, a fun game.

    However, it’s been taking more time than it’s been saving whenever I tried to get it to do more. Agentic frameworks rarely work beyond “add this bit of text to my notes while I work”, so you don’t have to search up and find certain documents. Or “tell me what my document says about so and so topic”. If you expect it to code for you, or manage your files properly, or not delete it’s own components, forget it. More effort than it’s worth.

    I actually shut down my VM, as I currently have no use for it whatsoever, and I don’t like using non-local AI models, for several reasons, I will only use them when necessary.

  • slazer2au@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    No, it’s made it worse. I already automated the work “AI” could do before gpt was released.

    Now when someone suggests a change there is always hallucinations of settings that don’t exist.

  • coherent_domain@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    I like how Yaron Minsky from Jane Street characterized LLM: “It is smarter than we expected it to be, but dumber than we needed it to be… It feels like something really dumb, but somehow memorized the entire internet.”

    This is kind of what I feel: despite all these impressive BAR and IMO achievements, in my work, I feel they do a great job at parapherasing the internet, but fails when you need it to do something mildly intelligent.

    Does it improve my efficiency? yes, but only at some very tedious and specific taskes, once I go slightly out of scope, it comes up with inelegant solution that I will need to rewrite from scratch.

  • zxqwas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Tldr: I think current AI hype is trying to go to get to the moon by building a better ladder. It’s useful but for a few select things.

    I’ve managed to automate some boring tedious task (get measurements from a dozen different wikipedia article, do simple maths with them), something that would take about an hour to do manually took 15 minutes to argue with an AI and fact check after.

    Creative stuff (stories, pictures, music) is amusing for a while but I suspect they are stuck in the same kind of uncanny valley robots have been in for a long time.

  • nil@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    I use LLMs to break down huge tasks into small pieces because I’m too lazy to do anything. I also use them to write emails. Basically everything that I think is bullshit, that I don’t have to do by myself.