• Gathorall@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    All that is already in effect in the actually sensible form. Therefore this bill must be about enforcing an insensible interpretation.

    • 1dalm@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 days ago

      Actually if you really read the bill most of the additions are concerning protecting political speech, not religious speech (which was already protected).

      So if it’s anything more than a political social media bait, then it’s about ensuring conservative kids can praise Trump, not God. (But really, it’s just bait that you guys are happy to swallow.)

      • magnetosphere@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 days ago

        I was reading your comment with interest until you decided to act superior and insult everyone. Bye!