• lumpenproletariat@quokk.auM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    Yes, so the richer the country the more meat, and the poorer the country the less meat. Ergo eating vegetables is cheaper than eating meat.

      • ageedizzle@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        you probably oversimplified

        It’s not enough to just claim this. You’ve got to actually explain how they oversimplified

        • goedel@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          It could be that in wealthy countries it is cheaper to consume meat due to factors like subsidization. Or, as I said, a thousand other factors.

          • ageedizzle@piefed.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            It could be that in wealthy countries it is cheaper to consume meat due to factors like subsidization

            You still pay for subsidies. You might not pay for it at the grocery store, but whenever the government is handing out money, that’s coming from the people, indirectly or not

            • goedel@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 days ago

              If its less money out of one’s bank then the subsidies are a secondary consideration if they’re considered at all