• Dippy@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Do you presume that an anarchist leaning society couldnt have any structures in place to protect the whole? (Such as an environmental protections agency.) Its all a sliding scale, and you dont need to embrace total anarchy in order to avoid the problems associated with authoritarianism.

    • PugJesus@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      No, no, not at all, I’m generally quite positive towards libertarian socialism. I love Anarchist Catalonia, the Makhnovists in Ukraine, Rojava. But I do also think it’s important to keep a realistic view of what such a society looks like and entails, and such societies inevitably include… well, making decisions for other people. My argument is against a utopian view of anarchy which will be dismissed by most people, even unprejudiced, and result in disillusionment when experiments fail to run as planned.

      I mean, fuck, this the classic ‘group project’ or ‘local government’ issue dialed up to life-or-death. Getting people on the same page is not always easy, especially when strong personalities - with social connections - are involved.

      You could say I’m taking a meme too seriously, and perhaps I am, but there are arguments laid out in this comment section which more clearly and distinctly express the exact sentiment in the meme I’m objecting to.