So as events unfold, the government updates its position. Why is the author presenting this as a bad thing? It’s not surprising that the Canadian government would initially be generally supportive of strikes; they had already declared the IRGC a terrorist organization after all.
So as events unfold, the government updates its position. Why is the author presenting this as a bad thing? It’s not surprising that the Canadian government would initially be generally supportive of strikes; they had already declared the IRGC a terrorist organization after all.
Agreed. What did people expect a centrist economist to say initially?
Consistency, standing up to the US.
I expected to him to shut his damned mouth instead of fully endorsing illegal wars and “IsRaEl’S rIgHt To DeFeNd ItSeLf”