• JackbyDev@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 days ago

      Some non-egg laying animal gave birth to an egg laying animal due to a beneficial mutation. So the “chicken” (or rather, any egg laying animal) came first.

      • JackFrostNCola@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        17 days ago

        I disagree, i think a chicken is the animal that comes from an egg and then lays an egg (to start the cycle anew).
        If the first animal you call a chicken isnt hatched from an egg then i think its not a chicken, but a predecessor.

            • JackbyDev@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              16 days ago

              No, I don’t think I’d agree. Something gave birth to something with a mutation that caused it to lay eggs that we’d call chicken eggs that produce chicken. Itself was born from a creature that didn’t lay chicken eggs.

              • JackFrostNCola@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                16 days ago

                Well now i think im inclined to agree with you.
                I have been defining it as a true chicken is the animal that came from the egg and reproduces the same animal in egg form.

                But if you were to say instead that the final mutation that created the gentically distinct animal we call a chicken, would still be that animal regardless of how it was created.
                Similar to if a chain of self replicating robots is traced back to the origonal unit, its still a self replicating robot even if the first was built by hands.