• Tja@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 months ago

    That’s not the only alternative. In other countries the building owner is required to clear the snow in front of their building, and it generally works quite well. The American version would be to allow people to sue building owners for damages if they don’t clear the snow.

    I’m sure there are other alternatives. Not saying they are automatically better, but asking to compare them is not a crazy demand.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 months ago

      A few problems with that solution:

      1. If the only people clearing the streets are doing it in front of buildings they control - how do the people who need tondo the cleaning get to the building to clean it?

      2. This was an exceptional storm, not a weekly occurrence, and proving damages for a single day will be difficult. And a fine won’t mean much 4 months from now when they pay up.

      What NYC needed was an immediate fix during a crisis.

      • Tja@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        If every tenant can sue their landlord for lost wages for the day, the landlords themselves will shell out the 30, or even 50 bucks to clear the snow, on short notice. Again, asking for a serious study (not a lemmy what-if) is not a crazy request, maybe they can be even better prepared next time.