• ☂️-@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    still a foot on the door. if we assume the real goal is to identify every internet user, a mandatory os-level system for storing a a bit of personal data is definitely step number one.

    once they have the data and the internet adopts this, requiring transmission or broadening the scope bit by bit is just a few updates away.

    • aksdb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      From an acceptance point of view there is no difference in forcing providers to implement an API to talk to your device or forcing providers to talk to a central service (or at least any service implementing a certain interface).

      If the goal was for more surveillance, they could have immediately gone for that route.

      They could also have kept the current “ask the user” approach and mandated website providers to store these information. That would have been a much smaller step and would have brought them closer to big brother as well.

      Now they went for an approach that takes a step away from what we already have, making it more privacy friendly. Websites don’t have to ask (and potentially store) your birthday anymore and can still stay compliant.