• lemming741@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    I knew a guy with one of those bike, and he had special towels in the garage because the tires couldn’t touch the ground

    Same dude swapped frames every year cause the manufacturer rolled out upgrades like Apple does iphones. One beam at a time, they went from round carbon fiber to triangular. He dare not be spotted on last year’s model!

  • Vinylraupe@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 days ago

    He opened his mouth tho and that slowed him down a little. The cyclist next to him turned his head tho which made him slower. Hmmm

  • Psythik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    2 days ago

    Stupid bullshit like this is part of why I hate cyclists. Especially the kind that ride in the middle of the road instead of sticking to the bike lake.

    • Nighed@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 days ago

      If it’s unsafe to go into the other lane to overtake, it’s probably unsafe to overtake them anyway.

      Lots of cyclists hold the lane when they feel unsafe being overtaken as it makes drivers think twice before trying.

      Yesterday, my group got overtaken while there was an oncoming car because the driver thought they could get through, horrible position to be in.

    • MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      Cyclists ride in the middle of the road because it’s safer and it’s what’s recommended to them to do via the highway code (in the UK).

      This is so that drivers don’t miscalculate the amount of space needed to give the cyclist so they don’t clip their handlebars with the wing mirrors and potentially kill a guy.

      As well as making the act of overtaking a more conscious effort. You ain’t going to chance it if you have to fully go into oncoming lane to do so.

  • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    2 days ago

    The most hilarious mod I’ve ever seen is people who remove three of the six screws holding the front chain ring in place – while being easily 50 pounds overweight.

    • FatVegan@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah it’s dumb. I bought my used mountain bike from a entusiaist. The bike was in really good shape with some of the best components money could buy at the time. Out of curiosity i asked him why he would sell the bike. He said he really liked it a lot, but it was just too heavy for long uphill rides. He then showed me the bike he replaced it with. A brand spanking new high end mountain bike. When i was home, i just had to know and compared the specs roughly from what i knew. My calculations said that his new bike was like 50 to 100gramms lighter. The guy wasn’t really a featherweight either. Eating less would’ve saved him like 5k

      • gajahmada@awful.systems
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        How much is the total weight of one the bikes ? 100 grams is insane. Their stool probably weighs as much, they should’ve just poop !

        • FatVegan@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          I weighed my bike at 16.5 kg

          That was my exact thought. If you pee before your ride you lose like 300g. Of course there is a difference between unsprung weight and stuff, but still… Same with carbon rims for mountain bikes. The prices are insane and they are pretty flimsy compared to just an alloy wheel.

      • zaphod@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s only kind of dumb, at least this way you get pretty neat gear at relatively low prices.

  • Harvey656@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    Meanwhile I own the world’s heaviest bike ever, and love it. I love the way my chest hair flows in the spring wind as I peddle in my baggy sweats. Nothing more freeing.

  • jballs@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    These sort of people crack me up, because every one of them hates e-bikes because they’re ”cheating". Like, dudes, we’re not racing. There are a lot of hills by my house and I would literally never ride a bike if I didn’t have some help going up them.

    I don’t see how having a motor to help you out and spending a few grand on a carbon fiber frame are much different. It’s all just making it easier for you.

    • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I don’t see how having a motor to help you out and spending a few grand on a carbon fiber frame are much different.

      Some people cycle as a sport, and races don’t let you have e-bikes. Plus, putting in all the work to climb a hill under your own power and getting to ride down is rewarding. Sure, getting a carbon fiber bike makes the work a bit lighter, but you’re still the one putting in all the work, which isn’t the case with e-bikes.

      While the people in your example are failing to understand that people habe different motives for cycling, you’re doing the exact same thing here.

    • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      I ride fixed distances (25 and 50 miles). Any improvements to the efficiency of my bikes means I’ll just get less of a workout each time. Why pay (so much) more just to get less exercise?

      • jivandabeast@lemmy.browntown.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        If you’re asking why pay for an ebike to get less of a workout, i think the framing of the question is wrong: you get an ebike because less exercise vs a normal bike is still more exercise than driving

        • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          I’m not talking about e-bikes, I’m talking about insanely expensive regular bikes where you pay extra thousands of $$$ to shave grams off the bike’s weight.

            • Venator@lemmy.nz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              It doesn’t matter, it’s a sport. All sport/games are about overcoming unnecessary obstacles within some arbitrary rules. They’re not training for the Olympics but they’re playing the same game: electric motors aren’t allowed in the Olympics so they don’t use them.

              As for why they get annoyed at others using electric motors I have no idea: It’s like if a chess player got annoyed if they saw someone playing checkers 😅

      • swicano@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I agree, that’s why I stopped lubing my bike chain and leave my tires 30 psi low (well that’s for glass and nails, but h workout is a free bonus)

  • InvalidName2@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    For every hair you shave, I’ll grow three. And then I’ll ride 0.05 hogsnaps to the roost per hour faster, just to prove it can be done.