• WhiteOakBayou@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 days ago

    Initially I was surprised that the Guinness is less dense than the monster but then I realized I’ve never drank 4 monsters in a sitting and maybe that’s why.

    • ozymandias@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      23 hours ago

      i reckon the nitro monster helps?
      also it’s probably entirely fake.
      wow, i just realized we’ve crossed over from “pic or it didn’t happen” to “video with moving camera or it didn’t happen”….
      eventually it will be “hologram or it didn’t happen”

      • WhiteOakBayou@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        20 hours ago

        If nitro monster means it uses nitrogen instead of CO2 for fizz, Guinness (15 or so years ago anyway) uses nitrogen too. We will need a hologram displaying verifiable totp keys to authenticate though.

        • ozymandias@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          yes the guiness drought cans use nitrous oxide, but the monster uses nitro glycerin….
          no wait….
          well the guiness has alcohol which is less dense than water….
          fine, i’ll make one and report back