• TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Yes, if a human saw a book enough times they would also be able to quote it from memory. They chose a very popular book which is almost certainly hugely overrepresented in training, try eg Kim Stanley Robinson’s Green Mars and see if it can reproduce it in full. It’s still not proper copying - and even if it was, copying is not theft, since the original person still has their original copy. Theft means you have it and the original owner doesn’t. If it’s ethical for individuals to copy media, it’s also ethical for LLMs to do it (regardless of if they actually do)

      • mushroommunk@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        Way to refute actual research with “trust me bro”. I love how slop defenders like yourself always rely on vibes arguments instead of data or research. Kind of indicative don’t you think? I’d post more research about how by relying on slop machines you don’t think and lose those skills. But I’ve been down this rabbit hole enough so I’ll go read a book instead

        • TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I was engaging with what the research showed and showing how it doesn’t show what you claim it does. That’s all…