If we want to see less public drug use and people sheltering on transit, we must begin by reopening and expanding supervised consumption sites and by addressing housing unaffordability.
You’re right about that! I just thought the controversy in BC was about safe supply, but I am out of the loop and not doing a good job googling.
I worked at Dundas and Victoria for years, just around the corner from the safe injection site for years and the only way you could tell it was there was the sign. I know they were never without controversy but it would suck if they were facing increased backlash.
Can you confirm you mean safe injection sites and not safe supply?
I could be wrong but I assumed the article was referring to safe injection sites.
You’re right about that! I just thought the controversy in BC was about safe supply, but I am out of the loop and not doing a good job googling.
I worked at Dundas and Victoria for years, just around the corner from the safe injection site for years and the only way you could tell it was there was the sign. I know they were never without controversy but it would suck if they were facing increased backlash.