• mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    The problem (at least in America) is that insurance will outright refuse to pay for preventative treatment until you’re old enough. It doesn’t matter if your doctor thinks it is necessary. The insurance’s doctor (who is paid directly by the insurance company, who didn’t actually look at your medical history at all, and who may or may not even exist) says it isn’t necessary, so they’ll refuse to pay. And that means that lots of the most vulnerable populations are entirely priced out of preventative treatment until they’re already in their 50’s (when insurance will start paying for it).

    • Velma@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      You’re right but it’s also dependent on your doctor, your symptoms, and where you live. Please don’t discourage others from seeking out treatment for this because it might be difficult to get insurance to cover it.

      • [deleted]@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        They are explaining why people in the US have barriers to doing the things that you are correct to recommend, not discouraging anyone from doing those things.

        • Velma@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          I understand, but being overly negative about it will also discourage people.

          My friend ignored her symptoms too long and died. I’d rather people try to get screenings done if they think there’s a problem rather than sucking it up and pushing through.