You can take “justifiable” to mean whatever you feel it means in this context. e.g. Morally, artistically, environmentally, etc.

  • auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 days ago

    Yes of course. There is no moral issue.

    IP is a scam, and the environmental impact is overblown.

    I trust everyone foaming at the mouth about ai is vegan because eating animals is way more destructive.

    • tomi000@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      And human life is way more destructive for the environment than AI, so I trust everyone complaining about AI killed themselves.

      See the flaw in this kind of reasoning?

      • auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        I see the flaw in your reasoning, yes.

        Going vegan isn’t equivalent to killing yourself. Just eat beans mate it’s easy.

        • tomi000@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          Being vegan or not has nothing to do with identifying bad faith arguments. I am a vegetarian just btw as it seems that gives me more credibility in arguing with you.

          Youre saying people are not allowed to care for one thing if they dont care for another vaguely related topic. Almost anything humans do is harmful for the environment and everyone needs to decide for themselves how important certain aspects are to them. Some people want to have kids which is absolutely terrible environment-wise. Would you say theyre not allowed to complain about oil lobbyism?

          • auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            Vegetarians are still carnists and it doesn’t give you any additional credibility, no. Less in my eyes on the ethical front.

            It’s not a vaguely related topic. It’s the same one, avoidable purchases which support environmental destruction. If it’s the environmental destruction that concerns you I’d hope you’d cut out the #1 avoidable cause before getting on a pedestal. Eating animals provides no benefits whereas using AI does, as evident from that Linux game thingie developer who got dogpilled on here the other day for saying he used ai to help him get over burnout.