• cecilkorik@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    18 days ago

    Just to put that in perspective, that’s enough to pay around a $1 million dollar annual salary to each of these 84,000 lost jobs, or to pay $100,000 salary and still keep 90% for themselves.

    Are they rich enough yet? Or do they still need more?

    • maplesaga@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      16 days ago

      I dont think its as simple as that, because if you start dishing the money out inflation rises and you erode what you’re taxing. Maybe on the gold standard it worked something like that, but that was a half a century ago now.