Just to clarify, I don’t think it’s a problem that hatred is minimal here, and I don’t just mean politics.
I feel like I very rarely see alternative opinions about anything, whether it be software, ai, news about companies, etc. it just seems like everyone universally agrees about anything with only a tiny handful of exceptions.
It makes me hesitant to believe I’m on the “correct side” and I never see any arguments from opposition. This makes me worried that I’m in some sort of echo chamber. In real life, I do see much more diverse opinions and, if I only used the fediverse for social media, would likely be weaker in defending my own since their arguments would be “new” to me.
I understand the reasons for which the fediverse has pretty collective opinion, but it does still worry me. I want to be able to see all the other people with their own thoughts (given it’s respectful) on the Internet, which should be the most capable tool to do so.
I think this idea of contradiction for its own sake is misguided and has contributed to copious enshittification, particularly on the www.
Obviously, “incestuous amplification” is similarly undesirable, but I’m personally opposed to the notion that a poorly informed counterpoint warrants the same audience as a well-informed point.
I mean, sure. But OP is basically just pointing out Lemmy is much closer to incestuous amplification.