A party that built its message around a strong, firm, and unequivocal case to end this war now would very suddenly draw attention to the undoubtedly dozens of congressional Democrats who would not echo this line. So what we get instead is limp process critiques, demanding pointless hearings, and bizarre attacks that Trump is not doing regime change fast enough. Polls repeatedly show the most common criticism of Democrats is not that they are too far left or too anti-war, but that they are too weak, that they don’t stand for anything.
Centering criticism of a deeply unpopular war on those carrying it out for not filling out the right paperwork or producing a satisfactory slideshow — rather than making clear, normative objections to a war of aggression — feeds directly into this perception. But perhaps it’s a perception Democratic leaders, and the pro-war, pro-Israel donors who fund their political careers, would prefer over the alternative.


Exactly. We say end the war because there is no logic. No plan.
If we just say end the war with no reasons given, it’s not as strong of an argument.
With all the muslim-hate, we can’t hope to stop the war on moral reasons alone.
Making it about money is one of the better strategies to get Congress to stop it, (as shitty as it is, that’s the truth).
Yeah, but here’s the thing… Dem leadership is not saying they want to end the war.
Thanks for reading the article.
Well the dnc is corrupt. I guess I was talking about the non corrupt ones.