• AmidFuror@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    14 days ago

    It’s almost impossible for us Westerners to grasp how a people could accept that level of authoritarianism, how they could value their personal freedom so little.

    This assumes that they have an alternative to authoritarianism that they could enact if they wanted. For some reason, the authorities don’t allow that. And the authorities also don’t like when people talk about it, so it’s difficult to discuss and convince others that authoritarianism is bad.

    • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      14 days ago

      Yes sure but China has never been anything remotely like a Western democracy. It would be difficult to keep the lid on a billion people if they really wanted to live differently. Political culture runs deep.

      • AmidFuror@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        13 days ago

        If they want to defer to authority, they can just keep voting in the ruling party. Democracy doesn’t mean no choices.

        • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 days ago

          Voting? Democratic elections are literally not a thing in China, at least not higher than the level of the village. There are no political parties other than the Communist Party. But for Western democracies I do agree. We have no excuses.

          • AmidFuror@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            13 days ago

            My later comment was misunderstood. If being ruled by strong Communist leaders is the “political culture” of China, then fine. Give them a choice every few years and they will keep selecting that.

            But we all know that the “revolution” needs to maintained by not giving the people the choice. If given a choice, the people might be “fooled” by Western influence and select someone other than the Communists. So the Communists pick all the candidates and then let the people choose only between them.

            The fact is that the “political culture” that supposedly backs authoritarianism would not survive free and open elections. The political culture being unwaveringly Communist is a sham and a lie.

            • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              13 days ago

              Fair point. I just looked into this and what I said was roughly correct: there are indeed somewhat open elections at the local level in China, but further up the pyramid everything is locked down by the Communist Party hierarchy, as you say.

              Turns out to be a pretty complicated system in theory, and it must work to some degree because China just had 40 years of incredibly successful development.

        • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 days ago

          Voting is absolutely meaningless in Xi’s China. But I gotta give it to them for their solar panel work. Too bad it’s all about to jump in price due to the idiotic tariffs.