Clown emojis all around

  • saltesc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    12 days ago

    PEGI and many other groups are private groups. They’re not an authority of any form. They’re not associated with government, public regulation, or public election. They’re a group of people that create their own standards outside of the ISO or any actual regulation representing the public.

    Some countries do have actual public systems, but many just have these private groups that know best.

    • 2pt_perversion@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 days ago

      They’re private groups that do the ratings but ESRB is enforced by laws in some Canadian provinces for instance and PEGI is enforced by law in some European countries. They do have a de facto authority in those places as a publisher can’t just decide to disregard their ratings and sell to minors anyway or something.

      • LorIps@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        12 days ago

        In Austria PEGI is “enforced” in Vienna while USK is “enforced” in Salzburg (and Germany, the reason why they buy all their games here). And PEGI might be shit, but USK is a million times worse.

    • Takumidesh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      This is all well and true, but it’s important to note that these organizations exist as a sidestep to regulation, they are formed by industry insiders as a promise to the regulators that they will be honest about how they rate games (or movies or music) so that the government doesn’t actually get involved and do it’s job.

      It’s a form of regulatory capture that allows the industry itself to decide what is harmful to us.

      It’s basically the definition of conflict of interest.