For the record I was posting in support of inclusive language, but pointing out that context and convention matter.

They seem to have even scrubbed my comment from their instance, lol.

      • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        20 hours ago

        OP stated what his intention and meaning here was but we got half a comment section int his thread trying prove that he meant something else.

        Very paternalistic behavior:

        1. removing OP’s agency then
        2. imposing punitive measure
        3. gas lighting “we told you what you meant, stfu!”

        Microcosm of the modding around much of Lemmy really. People with poor reading comprehension or outright bad faith actors?

        • yuri@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          20 hours ago

          babe the person you replied to stated that the context of the initial post matters.

          no matter the intention, it’s important to consider what the actual impact of the post could’ve been. you just took the piss. my replies to you are reiterating that the context DOES matter, and isn’t just “vibes”.

          • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            19 hours ago

            The context here is that OP was posting on lemmy.world when got accosted by some random person about usage of word “dude” being transphobic, which is not true.

            no matter the intention

            ohh really intent don’t matter no more?

            what sort of clown position is this? accusing people of “crimes” and it does not matter if they even meant to commit the crime?

            it’s important to consider what the actual impact of the post could’ve been

            If you are going to harass people online about their choice of words, they will clap back. This is internet 101.

            • yuri@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              19 hours ago

              they clearly weren’t banned for an intent that they only expressed in the post complaining about being banned. i hope you’re being willfully dense, because i can’t help you if you GENUINELY think this bullshit.

              • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                19 hours ago

                yes i genuinely think that this modding is grade A clown behavior lol

                the solution is to block the instance, that’s the lesson here.

                overzealous modding will eventually isolate instances with overzealous modding into echo chambers.

                but we need these discussions so that general public is educated on these issues.

                cheers!

                • yuri@pawb.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  19 hours ago

                  yeah it sounds like that instance is a bad fit for you. probably similar situation for most everyone incurring bans, and most likely the case for the folks who come to places like this to complain about them.

                  seems like the moderation is working perfectly! ^^