fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agomoms rulemander.xyzimagemessage-square86fedilinkarrow-up1928arrow-down114
arrow-up1914arrow-down1imagemoms rulemander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square86fedilink
minus-squareIllecors@lemmy.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoThis assumes a single child per set of parents, doesn’t it?
minus-squareSkunkWorkz@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 year agoNo I’m talking about the amount of ancestors in the 80th generation back not the total amount of ancestors. It doesn’t matter how many children each set of parents have for that number.
This assumes a single child per set of parents, doesn’t it?
No I’m talking about the amount of ancestors in the 80th generation back not the total amount of ancestors. It doesn’t matter how many children each set of parents have for that number.