erotador@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 11 months agogender nruletrallemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square53fedilinkarrow-up1841arrow-down112 cross-posted to: flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
arrow-up1829arrow-down1imagegender nruletrallemmy.blahaj.zoneerotador@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 11 months agomessage-square53fedilink cross-posted to: flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
minus-squareRachelhazideas@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up25arrow-down1·11 months agoMake the term ‘man’ gender neutral and make ‘maleman’ the new word for male humans. Then we can have ‘mailmaleman’.
minus-squarefestnt@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up4·11 months agobut could female humans be called femaleman?
minus-squareBorgDrone@lemmy.onelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·11 months agoOr just use ‘person’ instead of ‘man’. Then it doesn’t matter if someone is a person or a woperson.
minus-squareporous_grey_matter@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·11 months agoThat’s more or less what it historically was
Make the term ‘man’ gender neutral and make ‘maleman’ the new word for male humans. Then we can have ‘mailmaleman’.
but could female humans be called femaleman?
Or just use ‘person’ instead of ‘man’. Then it doesn’t matter if someone is a person or a woperson.
That’s more or less what it historically was