What a moronic headline?! UK is not Europe, and environmental protests are not criminalized in any other European country AFAIK.
Also there are rules for protests, if you break those, you may be arrested. Disregarding what the protest is about.
Edit:
To those that downvote, it’s the same as writing Asia is making something illegal, but it’s really only Thailand.
Please explain how that’s not moronic?
#1 is in UK.
#2 Could have easily been done legally.
repressive legal measures taken by universities
Which they can only do because they didn’t do the protests legally.
#3 is about the same as #2.
None of these are environmental, and has absolutely zero saying on the headline that claim:
Europe Criminalizes Environmental Protest
And it doesn’t disprove that these protests could have been arranged legally. There are reasons why we have legal frameworks for protests. One of the reasons is that protests need to be peaceful. Violent protests are NOT democratic: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/January_6_United_States_Capitol_attack
environmental protests are not criminalized in any other European country AFAIK… there are rules for protests, if you break those, you may be arrested. Disregarding what the protest is about.
What a moronic headline?! UK is not Europe, and environmental protests are not criminalized in any other European country AFAIK.
Also there are rules for protests, if you break those, you may be arrested. Disregarding what the protest is about.
Edit:
To those that downvote, it’s the same as writing Asia is making something illegal, but it’s really only Thailand.
Please explain how that’s not moronic?
PS: There are rules to prevent protests to turn violent, because violent protests are NOT democratic:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/January_6_United_States_Capitol_attack
If you think any protest anywhere ever is about following rules then you have completely missed the point of protest
Bullshit!!
Protests are part of the democratic process, and allowed in democracies.
Lol ok whatever. Keep telling yourself that.
#1 is in UK.
#2 Could have easily been done legally.
Which they can only do because they didn’t do the protests legally.
#3 is about the same as #2.
None of these are environmental, and has absolutely zero saying on the headline that claim:
And it doesn’t disprove that these protests could have been arranged legally. There are reasons why we have legal frameworks for protests. One of the reasons is that protests need to be peaceful. Violent protests are NOT democratic:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/January_6_United_States_Capitol_attack
Peaceful protest has literally never accomplished anything without the credible threat of violence, you are delusional
Dead wrong, you are historically and politically illiterate
Real coherent. lol.
Yes that is coherent, there are rules to for instance avoid violent protests. Violent protests are not democratic, violence and lawlessness is how fascism rise.
Like for instance:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/January_6_United_States_Capitol_attack