• Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I think we’re all aware of that. But I think we’re still expecting you to be able to explain since you posted it. Presumably you have read and agreed with the article. Else, why would you post it?

    • Buckminster Fuller@lemmy.wtfOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      But I think we’re still expecting you to be able to explain since you posted it.

      So does everyone on Lemmy who posts a link “explain” themselves? No.

      So no, I’m under no obligation to explain anything to you.

      • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Of course you’re not obligated, but it would help the discussion in this case. You don’t seem interested in a discussion though if you won’t even answer a question like OP’s.

        If you’re just blindly posting articles based on the headline you read, then just stop doing that. That’s not helpful to anyone.

        • Buckminster Fuller@lemmy.wtfOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          you don’t seem interested in a discussion

          I’m not. I posted an article. You can read or not.

          If you’re just blindly posting articles based on the headline you read, then just stop doing that. That’s not helpful to anyone.

          First, there is no rule on Lemmy or for this community that says I have to read the articles I post. Second, I did read the article.

          And I don’t have to discuss it. Read it or not. Up to you.