• redfellow@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    4 days ago

    Disruptive protests are annoying and the best way to get people to hate your agenda. In Finland there’s a group that actively protests climate stuff by taking control of the streets, making people getting to and off from work just annoyed.

    You don’t achieve change and can’t further your goals by being a prick to the normal everyday people. All you achieve is them wanting nothing to do with what you are peddling.

    • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      Imagine this comment existing before woman’s suffrage.

      Mass protests are how change has always happened to the oppressed. The oppressed have always continued to be oppressed when they take the stance of your comment.

      • redfellow@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Quite a bridge there, to compare governments and companies ruining our habitat to women’s suffrage. Holy hell.

        9 to 5 Joe is’t making the decisions and won’t be able to affect the situation apart from voting and activism, and these protests I talked about are only annoying the people the activists should be trying to win over, to be able to make a change.

        Suffrage wasn’t about profit driven business, it was people being shit to people, the poor and the rich all together, if we simplify it to the root.