Back with newsgroups the general rule was to go from general to specific. You start with a general discussion group and when discussions about video games get annoying you create a games group. If then there are too many Baldur’s Gate discussions you create BG. If they are dominated by Baldur’s Gate 3 you create a Baldur’s Gate 3 group. If everyone is fawning over Withers you create a Withers group which of course will be flooded with discussion about the Withers’ tits mod, which shall get its own group.

Meaning you should create a group when demand is there and not the other way around.

  • poVoq@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    8 months ago

    You just shouldn’t start a community and expect others to post in it a lot 🤷 Most people are lurkers anyways, and the prolific posters are probably already busy with their own communities. So especially in the beginning, it is yours to carry, so chose a topic you are personally interested in and know enough about to regularly post and make good comments. People will come if the community is worth it, the specialisation doesn’t matter.

    • Blaze (he/him) @lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      You just shouldn’t start a community and expect others to post in it a lot 🤷

      Also, that’s not what the post says. The post says to only fork a niche community once the more generic community sees a lot of content from that niche. It’s not opening a community and waiting for people to magically arrive.

    • small44@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      Not easy for a single user to constantly posts content for weeks or even months and still almost nobody else is posting