• noodlejetski@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 months ago

    I don’t think Peertube would handle mass migration of Youtube creators, unless each and every one of them set up their own instance.

    • L3ft_F13ld!@links.hackliberty.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      I’d honestly be curious to see how that plays out. Every creator hosts their own content while strengthening and spreading the Peertube network.

      I feel like that would quickly solidify it as a viable alternative.

        • Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 months ago

          In time the technical knowledge requirements may be reduced. I could see a small company selling pre-setup media servers with a couple TB of storage. Just plug it in, load up your videos and your basically done.

          And if you don’t have comments/users, there is little that needs to be maintained.

          It’s not perfect, but there will eventually be a point where YouTube becomes so enshitified that people begin to switch to alternatives.

          • pathief@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Nah, your ISP doesn’t give you enough bandwidth to host your own mini YouTube. You vastly underestimate the bandwidth required to run the service. It’s massive, which is why PeerTube is having a hard time gaining traction.

      • where_am_i@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        This, my friends, is a classic lemmy argument: “how about someone whom I already don’t pay anything go and do more work for less pay, so I can enjoy my content free, without ads, and don’t need to bother with an AdBlock”.

        How about, you, anon, set up a server, provide a simple upload API, and convince your favorite content creator to upload there? Since it’s no costs for them and very little work, they might. Maintain that for a year, then we’ll talk.

        • figaro@lemdro.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Then realize that YouTube was losing billions every year for over a decade, and that their current model is the only way it can be profitable for them 😅

          • where_am_i@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            The unfortunate business model of the current tech world.

            And the only way to teach them to drop this BS is to migrate to a better thing as soon as the enshitification starts.

            I would’ve told you we shouldn’t have fallen into this trap to begin with, but that implies cooperation of the entire internet. And that ain’t happening.

            On the other hand, we can accept that this is how things are. We get years of free trial and pay for it in the next years. 13$/month is not an insane amount of money for the value provided. And it’s shared with creators in a transparent manner, so it’s not like they’re hording all of it either.