Not gonna lie, not digging that branding. “Apple ID” just rolls off the tongue better.

  • can@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 months ago

    For a company so set on renaming every feature and claiming it their own I’m surprised they’d do this

    • reddig33@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      It was a dumb move. So much more important things to be working on. There was nothing wrong with the “Apple ID” naming. Renaming it just creates unnecessary confusion.

          • reddig33@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            And product marketing pushes for product renames like this. I wonder how much this will cost Apple in international trademark fees? Apple likes to recycle existing product names to save money (AppleWorks, AppleVision, iBooks, etc). I don’t think Apple Account was an existing trademark.

      • Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        As someone who had to support Apple products at an enterprise level, kindly fuck off. Trying to explain that an appleid is a users apple account is annoying as fuck, and they don’t remember it because it’s not labeled as an account, then bitch at the person trying to help them about long password reset process’s (or losing their data). Particularly when dealing with people with known anger issues that have the power to fire you on a whim.

        Standard terminology exists for a damn good reason. This is a very welcome change.

        • fartsparkles@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          I agree with you. It’s not identity, it’s an account. Laypersons are used to drivers licenses (IDs) and bank accounts. The rename is definitely a welcome change and makes Apple consistent with Microsoft and Google etc.

                • fartsparkles@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  Then don’t use the apps? You’re getting angry about free apps that you aren’t forced to use or even install (they are not even installed by default so you chose to install them).

                  Also as a LiO user since StarOffice, Apple’s apps are totally different beasts and I don’t see how they could be compatible. It’s like comparing Scrivener to WordGrinder; sure you can write a letter in both but they’re still fundamentally different apps with different functionality and design goals and their file formats aren’t ODF because of that.

                  If you need ODF/OOXML-like word processing, use apps that support them. Don’t expect non ODF/OOXML-like word processors to handle files they’ve no reason to be mucking about with.

      • ClassifiedPancake@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        So much more important things to be working on.

        Hundreds of Thousands of people working for Apple, I’m sure they are capable of doing multiple things at once.