• JigglySackles@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    Well they’ve been a shit company for awhile. This just seals it for me. Garbage ass product anyways.

  • MSids@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    15 days ago

    I really love my Synology NAS (DS220+). I don’t anticipate needing to replace it anytime soon, but given how well it’s treated me, I would almost certainly replace it with a 2024 model instead of a newer one if I had to, given this new limitation.

    This decision from them seems short-sighted, I hope they reverse it.

  • ulterno@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    Well, at least they have put 2 links on their product page, to the Compatible Drives page, suggesting that other drives might not work.

    For me, that only puts them in the “never buy” list and not in the “a crusade is coming” list.

  • dan00@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    15 days ago

    Congratulations on the spineless, disgusting piece of shit who imposed this decision. I will look forward to burn my NAS and let them know my opinion, for fucking sure.

  • OmegaMan@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    15 days ago

    “third-party HDDs”

    In my day we just called these… HDDs. Anytime something so ubiquitous has to be labeled third-party, you know who the bad guy is instantly.

  • Fades@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    15 days ago

    Haha wow what an absolutely HORRIBLE descision, wtf?! So glad I went with QNAP!!

  • Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    So, it doesn’t affect existing models, just the new ranges of NAS that will be released soon. And if you own an old one you can use it to format non supported drives and migrate to the newer models.

    Pretty shit, but at least it’s not going to majorly affect existing set ups.

    I wonder if Synology will realise how bad of a move this is and one day roll it back. This will kill their consumer level market share, do they have enough of an enterprise market for this to make up the difference?

  • ProtecyaTec@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    15 days ago

    This is unfortunate. My first NAS was an ASUS and it sucked balls to the point I made the switch to Synology and was able to get everything I needed working. Storage, external view access, connection to my apps. IDK what ima do when I need to move NAS solutions.

    • muusemuuse@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      my first NAS was a synology and it sucked so hard I moved to QNAP, which sucked less but still was bad, so I learned to just make and use my own mini server.

      I still remember their support telling me to open the SSH port to the public internet for their support team to look at it. fucking clowns.