• xavier666@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        What, you didn’t know you had to crank the power to high before microwaving your phone? Rookie mistake

    • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      I love the typo because it covers so many things at once

      Queue as in they’re lining up to do it; cue, as in that’s their cue to be stupid; and que (spanish for what) as in what the fuck are they thinking?

  • xep@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    13 days ago

    How does heat mitigate the dendrites? Also doesn’t extreme heat damage the batteries? They barely hold up under high temperatures as-is.

    • Thetimefarm@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 days ago

      I think it has to do with whether or not the battery has a current going through it while hot. I imagine heat probably makes the lithium more soluable in the electrolyte liquid, then the disolved material migrates with the current flow. Heating it without a current flow might allow it to redissolve and at least distribute it more evenly so it doesn’t make one long spike that shorts the battery.

  • x00z@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    13 days ago

    In the good ol’ days when I ran out of battery and every charger had a different stupid little connector, I often put my phone on the window still or heater to get a little bit of juice to do what I needed to do.

    I guess I am a scientist.

    • rogermiraki@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      13 days ago

      Wow, this brought back memories of me rubbing my hands against my old Nokia battery in middle school to heat it up and get a couple extra %.

  • vollkorntomate@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    I hope this article is well peer-reviewed. Otherwise this reads as if some LLM came up with the idea

  • Rolivers@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    Sounds like a horrible idea if not carefully controlled. Perhaps up to 80 degrees in an oil bath could redissolve some of the electrolytes. I guess it could work. Anything above 100 is asking for trouble.

    • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      13 days ago

      So you’re saying I SHOULDN’T preheat my toaster oven to 425F???

      UH-OH!!!

      brb. Gotta put out some fires.

      • Rolivers@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        Well the electrolyte solution is water based so exceeding the boiling point will cause pressure buildup inside.

          • Rolivers@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            13 days ago

            Good point. It’s highly concentrated inside a battery if not saturated. Hmm. I still wouldn’t expose them to such high temperatures.

            Perhaps a longer duration at lower temperature is safer. I might try it some day with some waste batteries and a battery tester.

        • isolatedscotch@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          13 days ago

          wha wha what

          no, it’s an organic solvent like ethylene carbonate/propylene carbonate + some other stuff, which have a boiling point of 230+°C ( 446°F)

          heating up batteries is (mostly) fine (under controlled scenarios with known good batteries, spicy pillows can always happen with bad batches) as long as the plastic holding them together doesn’t melt

          you physically CANNOT make a lithium ion battery with water because lithium reacts with water

          from the wikipedia page

          Lithium reacts vigorously with water to form lithium hydroxide (LiOH) and hydrogen gas. Thus, a non-aqueous electrolyte is typically used, and a sealed container rigidly excludes moisture from the battery pack. The non-aqueous electrolyte is typically a mixture of organic carbonates such as ethylene carbonate and propylene carbonate containing complexes of lithium ions.[45] Ethylene carbonate is essential for making solid electrolyte interphase on the carbon anode,[46] but since it is solid at room temperature, a liquid solvent (such as propylene carbonate or diethyl carbonate) is added.

  • hendrik@palaver.p3x.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    edit-2
    13 days ago

    Sure. But we need to see pics, or it didn’t happen.

    The abstract doesn’t mention them re-gaining their old capacity. It only says they shrink. And something about voltage. So I have my doubts. I mean it’s nice if my spicy pillow shrinks a bit. But what does that help if it continues to stay nearly dead? And an application in products would be hard to accomplish. At that temperature, all the plastic etc is going to melt. Maybe the solder as well.

    • Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      13 days ago

      Yes. If you aren’t reading any battery tech article with a huge amount of skepticism you are doing it wrong. More than any other tech sector I can think of, battery research is just absolutely plagued with low quality research that consistently gets picked up by media outlets.

      • drosophila@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        12 days ago

        It might be less the quality of the research and more this:

        (This comic is a bit outdated nowadays, but you get the idea).

        Except the headlines say “scientists report discovery of miraculous new battery technology using A!”.

        Also i think people don’t realize how long it takes to commercialize battery technology. I think they put them in the same mental category as computers and other electronics, where a company announces something and then its out that same year. The first lithium ion batteries were made in a lab in the 1970s. A person in 2000 could have said “I’ve been hearing about lithium ion batteries for decades now and they’ve never amounted to anything”, and they would be right, but its not because its a bunk technology or the researchers were quacks.

        • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 days ago

          All true, but I am going to be that nerd and point out that there were indeed commercial devices with lithium ion battery packs in them in the mid to late '90s, especially so in the late '90s. By 2000-2001 you couldn’t escape the damn things in cameras, disc players, PDAs, etc. So yes, it did take relatively forever for the technology to become commercially ubiquitous, but not that long. (And yes, the first couple of waves of Li-Ion batteries were indeed crap, and had all of us geeks clamoring for gadgets that still took AA’s for a while.)