• unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 months ago

        Nono, you see i am rewarding these leeches with the ability to gain glory and prestige by giving away their excess wealth.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_ancient_Greece#Taxation

        Liturgies could consist of, for instance, the maintenance of a trireme, a chorus during a theatre festival, or a gymnasium. In some cases, the prestige of the undertaking attracted volunteers (analogous in modern terminology to endowment, sponsorship, or donation). Such was the case for the choragus, who organized and financed choruses for a drama festival. In other instances, like the burden of outfitting and commanding a trireme, the liturgy functioned more like a mandatory donation (what we would today call a one-time tax), with the prestige of such a position and other elites’ social pressure reducing noncompliance.

    • kamen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      I agree with that, but can immediately see a loophole in it - that some rich folks are not reporting actual income.

    • Oxysis/Oxy@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      8 months ago

      It should be income adjusted up to a certain income amount where it becomes net worth adjusted. This way stocks, land, properties and possessions can be calculated in to make the fines more impactful for the ultra wealthy.

      Along with adjustments for not changing behaviors after previous fines.

    • SpaceScotsman@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      Adjusted to the initial sale value of the car - Less easy to cheat by not declaring income, and bigger cars (likely more expensive) that take up more space, pay more.

      • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 months ago

        This fails to scale into the millionaire level of wealth. Someone worth 10 or 100 million should be fined 10-100 times the amount of someone that has “just” 1 Million.

        • Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Also, realistically there is a cap to the value of a car that someone is gonna just leave parked in a bus lane.

          Nobody is going to leave a $40 million Ferrari 250 just sitting somewhere after all

    • FundMECFS@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Yeah. It’s kind of ignorant to expect the same fine for say a disabled person unable to work who scrapes by on 900 euros a month vs a super wealthy person on 500k euros a year.

      Fines shouldn’t really exist anyways. When for one person they’re a random expense that doesn’t even bat an eye vs for another person it means no food for a week.

      Even progressive fines are unfair. In that for someone who barely affords food every week losing 2% of your monthly income is devastating. While for a rich person they won’t even notice losing 2% of their income.

      • copd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 months ago

        The rich stay rich by not spending money. They’ll be devastated losing 2% of their income on a fine.